In the 1990s, Arizona became one of the nation’s first adopters of charter schools. The vision was to give parents more academic choices for their children and to provide learning environments more tailored to students’ individual needs. In many cases, however, Arizona’s charter school program has had the opposite result: Charter schools are choosing students who fit their mold. Indeed, more than two decades after charter schools emerged in Arizona, admission policies and procedures at many of the state’s charter schools unlawfully exclude some students or create barriers to their enrollment. Many schools have been able to get away with exclusionary practices for years without accountability.
Though charter schools operate independently, they are part of Arizona’s public education system and use taxpayer funds. As such, they are required to “enroll all eligible pupils who submit a timely application”
(A.R.S. § 15-184(A)). If more students apply than can be accommodated, schools can randomly select students through a lottery system
(A.R.S. § 15-184(E)). Arizona charter schools are also forbidden from discriminating against students on the basis of “ethnicity, national origin, gender, income level, disabling condition, proficiency in the English language or athletic ability”
(A.R.S. § 15-184(F)). But an analysis of Arizona charter schools’ enrollment materials shows many schools have policies and procedures that are clearly illegal or exclusionary. Specifically, out of the 471 Arizona charter schools that were analyzed, at least 262, or 56 percent, have policies that are clear violations of the law or that may discourage the enrollment of certain students.
There are currently 543 charter schools in Arizona (this total may vary slightly depending on factors such as whether a joint middle-high school is counted as one school or two). However, 72 schools do not make their enrollment materials available on the Internet and did not respond to requests for those public records, violating their obligations under Arizona’s public records law and making it impossible to analyze these schools on most or all enrollment metrics. The analysis focused on whether charter schools: